I just think there is indeed a blurred line that needs to be taken into consideration. That said, I think rape games definitely cross my personal line of morals, and I'd never desire to play one. The questions are A.) does this type of media actually suppress similar real-life crimes, B.) do we want to try to prevent crimes or rely on holding the potential criminals responsible for their behavior, and C.) at what point does a "thought crime" become a real crime?. The idea is that these men may hide their darker thoughts completely, and in extreme cases, some of them end up molesting children. One western example would be men in the priesthood. ![]() It's sort of a Forbidden Fruit thing.Īs for rape games, here's another devil's advocate: many people who enjoy these games claim that holding in these tendencies leads to quiet, private obsessions that may cause them to eventually unleash their urges in the worst of ways. There are a number of reasons as to why fetishes for young girls are common (and more accepted) in Japan, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's legal. They have a younger age of consent in Japan, I think, but only slightly. As far as I know, in Japan anything that does not involve real people (drawings, animations, games, videos) is allowed the understanding being that you're not actually hurting anyone. Grow up.There are immense cultural differences between Europe, the US and Japan. If not, well, wish I could say I feel sorry for you but I wouldn't waste my time. And if you have brains, the answer should be obvious. You might want to think about why that is. What kind of Cavedweller would enjoy being "entertained" by participating in such disgusting games? If this game involved a pedophile who stalked and raped a father and his two young sons, how long do you think it would have lasted? As you can see, nobody has considered creating a game like that. It normalizes sexual violence not only against women, but against girls and little virgin girls. This is not censorship, contrary to those who leap to the defense of the piece of lurid vile garbage RapeLay is. Rape is often way more heinous crime than murder, just ask the women in DRC if they would rather be gang-raped or killed. Something stinks there and I think it's Mr. Somehow I cannot respect someone who condones the use of inter-active rape games. ![]() While best known as the big, talking half of the Penn & Teller comedy magic team, Jillette is also an outspoken atheist and libertarian, views that regularly come to the fore in the duo's Showtime documentary series Penn & Teller: Bulls-t! ![]() At some level, in some small amount, it says, 'It's not really the rapist's fault it's society's fault for putting this stuff out here'." "What blaming the video game does is it shows compassion for the rapist. What that says is that we are all rapists and that rape is just under the surface of us and all we need is a video game to just push us a little way," he says in the video. "I think that blaming a video game for rape is normalizing violent sexual behavior. He makes an even more interesting argument when he suggests that blaming and banning the game as a catalyst for rape would "normalize sexual violence" more than the game itself. In a seven-minute YouTube ), Jillette notes that murder has been a central point of entertainment throughout history, pointing out that many Shakespearean plays feature violence and death, and questions why rape, while a horrible crime, would be the focus of such an uproar while killing is barely worth a PG13 rating. In a recent podcast, Penn Jillette of RapeLay because it "normalizes sexual violence."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |